For the Common Defense


FY 2011 Detailed ReportsFY 2011 Summary ReportsResources
All 50 States Detailed ReportsAll 50 States Summary ReportsAll Congressional District Spreadsheet Reports
New Jersey Contractor Location Data ReportsUSA Overview Summary ReportGovernment Contracting Office Glossary
New Jersey Place of Performance Data ReportsNew Jersey Summary ReportFAQ
  FY 2010 Reports Archive

New Jersey

Defense Breakdown Economic Impact Report
By Contractor Location Data -- Sorted by Congressional District

(FY 2011 Defense Contracts Baseline Data)

Includes Estimated 9% Annual Budget Reduction
And
Estimated 18% Sequestration Annual Budget Reduction
Starting in FY 2013

Go to www.forthecommondefense.org/reports to view detailed reports on New Jersey counties, cities, Congressional Districts, industries, small businesses and information on sources and methodology.


         BACKGROUND ON THE DEFENSE BUDGET CUTS: 2013-2021

  • Our military is carrying an unfair burden of deficit cuts. To date our Defense budget has been hit with 50% of deficit reduction - yet it accounts for less than 20% of total federal spending.
     
  • Earlier Budget Cuts: the first 9% Defense Budget Reduction: Defense budgets for 2013-2021 were cut $487 billion -- an average 9% cut over 9 years. In 2012, President Obama limited U.S. military capability to fighting one "regional conflict" and one "holding action."
     
  • Sequestration Budget Cuts: the second 9% Defense Budget Reduction: "Sequestration," also required by law in 2011, mandates $500 billion more in 2013-2021 defense cuts -- an average total 18% cut. In 2011 President Obama said "I will veto any effort to get rid of those automatic spending cuts."
     
  • Alternative solutions have been proposed to maintain a strong defense, reduce our deficit and avoid tax increases: Elected officials have proposed that the President and Congress reduce mandatory entitlement spending and make cuts in the non-security programs in the Federal budget.
     
  • Be Prepared: These reports show how estimates of 2013 defense budget reductions of 9% and 18% could affect New Jersey with cuts in defense jobs and businesses. Ask your elected officials for ongoing updates on how these defense cuts will affect your community.
 

StateContract YearDistrictContract Count$ AmountReduction
   by 9.0%
Reduction
   by 18.0%
New Jersey2011 1st - Robert E. Andrews (D)2,806$405,998,475-$36,539,864-$73,079,728
New Jersey2011 2nd - Frank A. LoBiondo (R)709$32,264,158-$2,903,774-$5,807,549
New Jersey2011 3rd - Jon Runyan (R)2,178$2,253,628,641-$202,826,586-$405,653,171
New Jersey2011 4th - Christopher H. Smith (R)1,115$391,018,049-$35,191,626-$70,383,252
New Jersey2011 5th - Scott Garrett (R)1,707$501,615,728-$45,145,417-$90,290,835
New Jersey2011 6th - Frank Pallone Jr. (D)746$788,833,983-$70,995,061-$141,990,123
New Jersey2011 7th - Leonard Lance (R)1,258$330,802,916-$29,772,264-$59,544,527
New Jersey2011 8th - Albio Sires (D)976$450,651,559-$40,558,642-$81,117,284
New Jersey2011 9th - Bill Pascrell Jr. (D)1,007$235,211,839-$21,169,066-$42,338,133
New Jersey201110th - Donald M. Payne Jr. (D)409$82,747,215-$7,447,250-$14,894,499
New Jersey201111th - Rodney Frelinghuysen (R)6,911$837,746,378-$75,397,177-$150,794,354
New Jersey201112th - Rush D. Holt (D)1,140$1,401,214,940-$126,109,350-$252,218,699
TOTAL  20,962$7,711,733,881-$694,056,077-$1,388,112,154

A Note on the Breakdown by Congressional District

Calculated totals of Revenues and number of contracts for Defense contracts for each congressional district are estimates, because the amounts are aggregated by zip code, and a single zip code may include portions of two or more congressional districts.

To obtain these estimated total revenues for any given congressional district, the following algorithm was used:

1. If the zip code was located only in a single district, the amounts (number of contracts, dollar amount) for that zip code were assigned in full to that district.
2. If a zip code was located across multiple districts, the amounts (number of contracts, dollar amount) were divided by the number of districts shown in the listing, and assigned to each of those districts. Rounding errors were adjusted in the final district of the sequence, so that the total amounts remain the same overall. Whole dollars (no cents) were used in each such distribution.

The results are therefore of necessity approximate. CSP has developed a custom report for individual congressional districts, available on request, which provides contractor data for all zip codes that lie completely or partially within a given congressional district. In this way, researchers who request the report can determine the location of contracts for the district on a block by block basis.

Data sources and more data available at www.governmentcontractswon.com, compiled from public data at www.fpds.gov

Created by the Center for Security Policy Defense Breakdown Economic Impact Report Generator (v.2.7.0-CL) February 21, 2013 00:12:06 www.forthecommondefense.org