For the Common Defense


All ReportsReturn to Contractor LocationReturn to State IndexFAQ PageUSA Summary Reports

Michigan Defense Breakdown Economic Impact Report

Defense Contracts by Congressional District (est.), Michigan, 2009

Using Contractor Location Data -- Sorted by Congressional District

Michigan Summary Report

Go to www.forthecommondefense.org/reports to view detailed reports on Michigan counties, cities, Congressional Districts, industries, small businesses and information on sources and methodology.

StateContract YearDistrictContract Count$ Amount
Michigan2009 1st - Dan Benishek (R)458$109,088,479
Michigan2009 2nd - Bill Huizenga (R)1,879$304,120,781
Michigan2009 3rd - Justin Amash (R)1,346$145,395,449
Michigan2009 4th - Dave Camp (R)254$87,366,979
Michigan2009 5th - Dale Kildee (D)625$33,004,020
Michigan2009 6th - Fred Upton (R)536$53,526,332
Michigan2009 7th - Tim Walberg (R)898$215,139,106
Michigan2009 8th - Mike Rogers (MI) (R)307$122,160,028
Michigan2009 9th - Gary Peters (D)1,276$162,819,793
Michigan200910th - Candice Miller (R)985$1,881,305,001
Michigan200911th - Thaddeus McCotter (R)932$114,660,785
Michigan200912th - Sander Levin (D)1,100$1,801,060,409
Michigan200913th - Hansen Clarke (D)203$495,811,305
Michigan200914th - John Conyers Jr. (D)216$255,794,069
Michigan200915th - John Dingell (D)454$89,303,400
TOTAL  11,469$5,870,555,936

A Note on the Breakdown by Congressional District

Calculated totals of Revenues and number of contracts for Defense contracts for each congressional district are estimates, because the amounts are aggregated by zip code, and a single zip code may include portions of two or more congressional districts.

To obtain these estimated total revenues for any given congressional district, the following algorithm was used:

1. If the zip code was located only in a single district, the amounts (number of contracts, dollar amount) for that zip code were assigned in full to that district.
2. If a zip code was located across multiple districts, the amounts (number of contracts, dollar amount) were divided by the number of districts shown in the listing, and assigned to each of those districts. Rounding errors were adjusted in the final district of the sequence, so that the total amounts remain the same overall. Whole dollars (no cents) were used in each such distribution.

The results are therefore of necessity approximate. CSP has developed a custom report for individual congressional districts, available on request, which provides contractor data for all zip codes that lie completely or partially within a given congressional district. In this way, researchers who request the report can determine the location of contracts for the district on a block by block basis.

All ReportsReturn to Contractor LocationReturn to State IndexFAQ PageUSA Summary Reports

Created by the Center for Security Policy Defense Breakdown Economic Impact Report Generator (v.2.2.0-CL) February 19, 2012 23:58:42 www.forthecommondefense.org